Shooting of the Day
Out of context: Reply #467
- Started
- Last post
- 2,851 Responses
- yurimon0
Some circumstance of gun ownership have prevented and kept people safe and in other circumstances people have been killed unjustly.
When the crime is successful it gets more statistical credit and more press. I am sure there are incidences unreported in preventive cases. its not so easy to weigh for the simple fact.
The connecticut case is another beast. You have a series of similar shootings where guns was used in a crime but is not the primary cause of the crime. The cause of the crime is the an individual deciding to commit the a crime and the conditions that have brought this person into the state of mind to act.
The similarity in some of these cases like batman, gilfords or columbine. is Medication, which is a catalyst. More facts need to be brought out who, what and respective affiliations. I am not ruling anything out in this case because of similarity but still holding out for more facts which are not completely represented or looked into.
So Sorry I aint falling for it so quickly. Is it possible that I would agree with restrictions on certain weapons? possibly. Right now in the news it appears like manufactured consent.
- If you think it's even remotely possible that guns have saved more lives than they have taken, you are delusional.********
- You are only right if you are referring to war. Crime is a different situation.yurimon
- No, it really isn't.********
- Do you realize that what you're saying is, "Guns save lives"? Do you understand what delusional means?********
- http://en.wikipedia.…********
- If I was in danger and I can defend myself then yes, its saved my life. maybe not that of the perpyurimon
- If I have a family and can defend them however i do it. then yes I saved them as well.yurimon
- Your example sounds like it's from the script of a bad TV show. Real life isn't like that.********
- Regardless, there is simply no way that guns could be considered to save more lives than they take. Think about it.********
- nb, you delusional? You cant scream guns kill people and not allow for guns to save people. Guns dont kill people, people with guns sometimes kill people and ... people with guns sometimes save people. Why else do the cops, security have them? Get off your delusional high horse...whhipp
- with guns sometimes kill people and ... people with guns sometimes save people. Why else do the cops, security have them? Get off your delusional high horse...whhipp
- them? Get off your delusional high horse...whhipp
- Well it happens people defend themselves successfully and yes cases that people dont.yurimon
- I don't mean to be a dick, but if you guys actually believe that... you should talk to a therapist or health professional about it.********
- they have potential to save the lives of the ones you are protecting. but yes they take lives in general.yurimon
- In a perfect world there are no guns and no need for them.yurimon
- well nb i guess you failed at not being a dick, bravo!whhipp
- Guys, he is trying to help you, therapy works!********
- you should go maybe cure your problem of thinking you are the sane one.yurimon
- https://www.ironspri…********
- If you think it's even remotely possible that guns have saved more lives than they have taken, you are delusional.