Politics

Out of context: Reply #18479

• Started
• Last post
• 33,773 Responses

• whhipp0

  My comment still stands... Obama has not stood by his action or inaction relating to benghazi specifically... which, in turn, has no intelligent way to respond in a way that you did. You can not argue that Romney doesn't stand by his decisions to counter my argument that Obama is a coward. Ok, if you want to say Romney is a coward, just state that. But, you have not successfully argued against my assertion that Obama is a coward specifically relating to his actions in the Benghazi case.

  And why the name calling dude? I do not know you nor do you know me... I have a point of view that you disagree with and, most likely, I disagree with your point of view. No need to call me an idiot.

  whhipp 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • By your definition the entire GOP are cowards. How about those WMDs in Iraq, neocon?aaux
  • How about 9/11, neocon? The GOP failure to capture/kill bin laden, and then pretending he's not a target anymore, neocon?aaux
  • Your definition of coward only applies to democrats, you neocon hypocrit.aaux

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread