Libya embassy attack
Out of context: Reply #34
- Started
- Last post
- 73 Responses
- pr20
At first i saw it simply as some enraged Muslims revealing their bad taste for bad movies no one will even see (or would have if they kept shut) but reading the article in the Guardian about the director raising 5m from 100 investors...
Lets crunch the numbers: 5m / 100 investors = $50k per investor. It is not some spare change - this money came from wealth and potentially influential people (here Jews as the article states) who have a very specific agenda.
Muslim outrage is not against some silly youtube film about their religion but rather against the system where a non-talented quack like this director can raise $5m to push his hateful agenda only because it correlated with the view of the few wealthy and powerful. And if the "wealthy & powerful" are ok with controlling our views with such blatantly bad films what other ways do they use to exercise control over our perception of the world? For instance anybody can name how many Jews died in Holocaust but not too many know that it's the Chinese and Russians who suffered the most in WWII each loosing 20m+ of their citizens to the war. Why is that?