Creationist designers?

Out of context: Reply #37

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 77 Responses
  • whhipp0

    So tell me... what is a fact in science that leads to non-creationism?

    • The problem for you is, Creationism disproves itself. Eve created out of rib?...CanHasQBN
    • Noah's Ark... two of each animal happily boarded onto a ship. Talking snakes...CanHasQBN
    • The complete absurdity of this stuff alone disproves creationism. If you cannot recognize that book as a book of fables and talesCanHasQBN
    • of fables and tales, then you need to check yourself into a mental institution.CanHasQBN
    • So you have no scientific fact that disproves creationism?whhipp
    • Nothing in science is fact as far as proving the origins of the universe. We have ideas and theories based on what we can observe...CanHasQBN
    • observe.CanHasQBN
    • How about this fact.. you can't make a person out of someone else's rib.CanHasQBN
    • Snakes cannot speak to humans.CanHasQBN
    • I could run facts all over creationism that disprove it... facts that don't even need testing.CanHasQBN
    • And your pitiful defense would sound something like "miracles happen".CanHasQBN
    • You assume too much. And you have no proof that a super natural being does not exist. So until you do keep an open mind to all possibilities or you might miss it.whhipp
    • to all possibilities or you might miss it.whhipp
    • And YOU don't have proof that there isn't a pair of Nike shoes orbiting Pluto right now... correct?CanHasQBN
    • Therefore, based on your logic, there's a pair of Nike shoes orbiting Pluto at this moment.CanHasQBN
    • ... because you can't prove me wrong.CanHasQBN
    • There's also a planet out there made of plastic and looks exactly like a giant hockey puck...CanHasQBN
    • ...right down to the NHL logo. Whipp, can you disprove this? No? Then my position stands that a hockey puck planet exists.CanHasQBN
    • exists.CanHasQBN
    • So the possible existence of a super natural being is compared to the possible existence of a pair of Nikes orbiting Pluto. Really? I would hope you know Life is a bit more spectacular than that.whhipp
    • orbiting Pluto. Really? I would hope you know Life is a bit more spectacular than that.whhipp
    • Right on. Believe what you want to believe. Just dont try to disprove what I believe without rock solid proof.whhipp
    • AT LEAST I can prove that Nike's exist AND that Pluto exists. You can prove absolutely nothing!CanHasQBN
    • Anyway the point of that was to show you how flawed you logic is. It is up to YOU to prove creationism. The onus is on YOU.CanHasQBN
    • YOU.CanHasQBN
    • Fun times CanHas.whhipp
    • The funnest. See you in the gun thread!CanHasQBN
    • lol :)moldero

View thread