Creationist designers?

Out of context: Reply #29

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 77 Responses
  • Horp0

    "Cool. So pretty much, you can bend anything in that book to suit your beliefs"
    – CanHasQBN

    And so can you.

    Horp 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Precisely displaying just how unreliable it is.CanHasQBN
    • Its only the person reading it that is unreliable.Horp
    • So I am unreliable because I understand days as days? If the 1000's of translators of this book wanted us to think somethingCanHasQBN
    • something other than "days", surely they could have mentioned that it was in fact thousands or millions of days.CanHasQBN
    • CanHasQBN-get a life, i believe gramme explained it very well right above.whhipp
    • That depends on what your definition of "in fact" isORAZAL
    • LOL. gramme did not explain shit. All he said is "days could mean trillions of years". All based on his personal opinion.CanHasQBN
    • This kind of loose, baseless thinking holds no water against the standards upheld by science.CanHasQBN
    • Oohh Science. Yeah, thats never wrong.whhipp
    • The difference is, when science is wrong, it admits it's wrong, and continues forward.CanHasQBN
    • It's not based on my personal opinion. It's based on the study of ancient Hebrew by many theologians.gramme
    • Canhas, which modern, authority-commission... translation of the original ancient manuscripts are you working from?Horp
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread