Gun laws..
Out of context: Reply #250
- Started
- Last post
- 344 Responses
- CanHasQBN0
If one goes on and on about the right to bear arms and the need to protect their family, but then in the same breath proclaims that 100-round clips should continue to be legal, then there's something wrong with that picture.
There's a separate, violent voice in that person's head that is speaking not for the right to bear arms, nor to protect family.
Why can't we regulate weapons and ammunition? For what purpose does a 100-round clip serve other than to massacre 30 people?
Why are you OK with some forms of regulation to weapons, but not others? Surely an fully automatic weapon would work better against a tyrannical government than your little pistol, right? So where do you draw the line as to what you're ok with regulating, and what you're NOT ok with regulating?
Is your safety in any more danger because fully automatic weapons have been made illegal? Would your safety be in danger if 100-round clips were made illegal?
- Vacation time. See you Monday.CanHasQBN
- Most people that believe you have the right to have a weapon to protect your home ...CygnusZero4
- ... dont believe 100 round clips should be legal. I own a gun and dont think I should have a clip that holds that.CygnusZero4