Gun laws..
Out of context: Reply #237
- Started
- Last post
- 344 Responses
- CanHasQBN0
@melq
1) LOL. You proved my point. Yes, drugs do contribute to gun crime. So why make guns more accessible to people on drugs or who deal drugs? Put greater restrictions on guns. You imply it's people on drugs are the ones who do the shooting... so your next idea is to allow guns to be as easily accessible as possible??? Please try to be a LITTLE bit logical. Please.
Your asinine train of thought:
"There are lots of crazy people out there on drugs" >> "Let's lessen the restrictions on guns so that they are more accessible"2) The "practice" that these citizens put in at the range (a mellow, controlled environment) is hugely different than a criminal situation. I'm not saying they would be "randomly firing in any direction". I'm saying they will attempt to fire at the criminal, but miss, do to a moving target, smokey environment, inexperience under pressure, and innocent people running in front of one's aim. The variables are endless.
Anyway, there are no requirements that one must take a class in order to own a gun. So are you saying that this additional stipulation be added in order to own a gun? Are you, in fact, pro-regulation?
3) You gave a reddit link with a list of instances where guns prevented crime. 91 instances to be exact. Here's the thing though, I never said "Guns have never prevented a crime". I'm saying that it happens so rarely, that it doesn't compare to the instances where guns are used FOR crime.
4) Even if the Syrians were armed, it would make no difference. The Syrian military has roving tanks and jets flying overhead that can bomb out a city in 3 minutes. Citizens with guns will never put up a fight against a modern army.
As long as we keep over-funding our (US) military, we'll never be able to challenge it. It's funny how it's the right-wing pro-gun people that are the ones who love funding the military as much as possible. These citizens happily give the majority of the nation's tax dollars to the thing they fear most. That's how stupid these people are.
- I'm sorry, but it's almost like you're just trying argue. I'm not. I was just offering some counter points.melq
- I notice you, too, glossed right over the "Stupid Girl" point. I find it telling that you don't find shitty pop music dangerous.melq
- Just trying to argue??? You addressed my earlier points. So I am addressing yours.CanHasQBN
- I didn't even know what you meant by posting that. I'm not going to watch an entire video for some hidden message...CanHasQBN
- Oh you are the type that blames music and video games on crime... holy... shit. These are the kind of people I am arguing against..CanHasQBN
- arguing against on QBN. Wow.CanHasQBN
- Read your text. It's delivered with all the eloquence and style of a conservative talk radio host. "To disagree with me makes you an idiot!"melq
- ...with me makes you an idiot!"melq
- -> Garbage joke
...
-> Your headmelq - Seriously, dude. I was trying to lighten things up with a joke. You're a bit of a job, 'eh?melq
- Maybe you need to work on your ability to give a joke, eh?CanHasQBN
- Why don't you respond to my points instead of bullshitting around in the notes?CanHasQBN
- Sure, take the easy way out. Call someone a "job" and tell them to "lighten up"...CanHasQBN
- I told you, you want to argue, I do not. You had questions, I addressed them. You respond with LOL and ???? and a bunch of stupid shit trying to provoke me. No thanks.melq
- ...bunch of stupid shit trying to provoke a response. No thanks.melq
- So, you are offended by my "LOL" and my multiple question marks?CanHasQBN
- hahahahaha. Amazing.CanHasQBN
- You are the type that posts something, and then runs when someone refutes your points.CanHasQBN