Gun laws..
Out of context: Reply #222
- Started
- Last post
- 344 Responses
- CanHasQBN0
albums, I never got a response on this post:
- - - - "So just because your weapon of choice (a gun) statistically kills less than another weapon of choice (a car), does that justify it's existence? Was Saddam's regime justifiable because Hitler actually killed more innocent people than Saddam?" - - - -
Your continued inane comparisons, and your mentality that gun deaths are justified because OTHER things in this world also cause death is absurd. Basically, in your mind, as long as there's something else that statistically kills more people than guns, then gun deaths are justified. How stupid is that? I laugh every time you post stats.
Since you keep comparing guns to cars, here's are some stats for you:
239,800,000 cars in the USA
32,885 car deaths in 2010
=0.0137135%80,000,000 gun owners in the USA
11493 gun deaths (your stat)
=0.01436625%The death percentage rate is lower per car owner than it is per gun owner. Statistically, cars are safer than guns.
There are more car deaths in quantity only because more people own cars than they do guns. And one can understand that, because people need cars to function and to get to work on a daily basis in this country. You do not need a gun to function daily, people do not use their guns on a daily basis..... and yet the gun death % rate is STILL higher than the car death % rate. Funny huh?
Personally, I hate cars. But your comparisons against them versus guns hold no water.
- oh noes.. albums didnt respond to a question.. what is QBN coming to..autoflavour
- i want a car that is a gunautoflavour
- or a tank, which ever is easier to driveautoflavour
- auto wants some attention..?CanHasQBN
- ban statistical facts!fooler
- well you can take your fact and shove it up your! Amerika is not build on fact but faith!!pango
- Fact it to him! Fact X Importance = NewsqTime