Colorado theater shooting...

Out of context: Reply #292

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 373 Responses
  • CanHasQBN0

    "Almost no one" = Cold Hard Science! Give real numbers from real studies, then you may have a point.
    – antagonlsta

    - - - - - - - -

    If it is presumed that "almost no one" owns a gun in Japan, then it would be impossible to do a study, because the few who do own a gun would be unwilling to admit they do........ because guns are banned.

    I also love that you will only believe Baskerville's post "may have a point" if there are real numbers available. What makes you think the below numbers do not hold up??? Look it up for yourself.

    "In 2008, the U.S. had over 12 thousand firearm-related homicides. All of Japan experienced only 11, fewer than were killed at the Aurora shooting alone. And that was a big year: 2006 saw an astounding two, and when that number jumped to 22 in 2007, it became a national scandal. By comparison, also in 2008, 587 Americans were killed just by guns that had discharged accidentally."

    It seems as though no amount of statistics will convince you that gun control works... even overwhelming numbers like the ones above. I seriously believe you are mentally damaged.

    CanHasQBN 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • no it isn't impossibuu. and im not here to prove your stupid point. numbers bro, give numbers.antagonlsta
    • There are plenty of numbers in this post, like 12,000 gun homicides in US.... vs 11 gun homicides in Japan.CanHasQBN
    • my post was an excerpt from the article above from Atlantic magazineBaskerviIle
    • look. quoting wikipedia and bbc.uk isn't facts, also most of these stats are bullshit arbitrary. no study supporting them numbers. so bsantagonlsta
    • LOL @BaskerviIle so, ive read that Hillary Clinton is an alien of the publication The Enquirer.antagonlsta
    • look Basker. i'm not fuckig with you, but that shit inst a study.antagonlsta
    • it's an opinion piece and you're using as fact.antagonlsta
    • @CanHas. you don't even give a source. so if you cant even cite a fact properly then i assume you are bullshitting me.antagonlsta
    • Here you go: http://www.gunpolicy… Click on Gun Death and Injury, then click onCanHasQBN
    • Number of Gun Homicides.CanHasQBN
    • You are correct. These are not studies. ...They are FACTS. Actual statistical data.CanHasQBN
    • I do not how much more more data you need. You seem to be the type that loves to ramble on about stats, yet when the stats disagreeCanHasQBN
    • disagree with your stance, you completely brush them off.CanHasQBN
    • show me the link, show me these findings! or are you just regurgitating in which i have no interest.antagonlsta
    • Huh?? I showed you the link. It's a few notes back. Are you clinically insane?CanHasQBN
    • take it easy champ, maybe a mydal can help with your severe menstruation pains ffs.antagonlsta
    • So all you can do is avoid the content of my comments and tell me to take a midol... how pathetic.CanHasQBN
    • "I couldn't refute your facts, so I'll make fun of you... just as a child would" --antagonlstaCanHasQBN
    • your source is a private citizen sponsored website. his name is PHILIP ALPERS. look him upantagonlsta
    • my sources is a governmental body called U.S. Department of Justice.antagonlsta
    • dude, you're getting all emotional on me. if you wanna discuss fine, bot don't hold a tantrumantagonlsta
    • see next page......CanHasQBN
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread