Colorado theater shooting...

Out of context: Reply #72

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 373 Responses
  • antagonlsta0

    it's a mistake to over simply the problem of gun violence by responding in a solution of outlawing firearms. Take a look at the nations drug legislation and you'll see it does very little to curb drug activity. Shit, drug abuse is not only high in illegal substances but also prescription / so called controlled substances.

    also look at nations that do outlaw guns, they too have gun violence. why isnt that number zero? people are simply going to use guns.

    the problem is deeper than "take'em guns away" and most advocacies don't even offer real world logistical solutions. look, the guns are already out there, making them illegal or forcing voluntary incentives is a 100 year late response.

    i've think the solution is in the ammo. since the guns are already in circulation, why not track the bullets (rfid) the technology is possible and in use in other industries. (as in tracking individual units instead of or/with lots) today, you can buy up to 1 metric ton of ammunition without having federal involvement and even after that ton you can circumvent most federal interviews.

    it's the lobbist we must confront.

    • "Bullets should cost $5,000 a piece"albums
    • - Chris Rockalbums
    • late or not, it's at least a response, but saying it's too late and we shouldn't bother is just ... ugh, infuriatingmonospaced
    • the idea of asking the government to take something away is a poisonous abstractionantagonlsta
    • taking away devices designed SOLELY for killing humans and getting away with it is necessary, IMOmonospaced
    • not the only poisonous abstraction I see is saying that modern guns are a right to bear and ownmonospaced
    • do you see any value in gun ownership? any reason to have recreationaly?antagonlsta
    • for hunting purposes, sure, but nobody needs an automatic weapon, iMOmonospaced
    • and there lies the problem with our gun laws. it has to accommodate law abiding citizens.antagonlsta
    • a law abiding citzen doesn't need a gun made for killing peoplemonospaced
    • idk what you mean by that. what are you suggesting. baseball bats can be used for killing, yet not designed to.antagonlsta
    • people use automatic weapons for industrial farming uses. they use auto for hunting. what WE say they should use is a different discussionantagonlsta
    • a different discussionantagonlsta
    • but i agree with you. legislation for striker automatic ownership is needed.antagonlsta
    • I need a fully automatic gun like some guy needs a Ferrari over a Yugo. Simply because.albums

View thread