Shell Oil - Social Media Experts
Shell Oil - Social Media Experts
Out of context: Reply #32
- Started
- Last post
- 54 Responses
- uuuuuu0
What is so wrong about it? Greenpeace never denied their involvement, they said they did it on their site. They aren't defrauding anybody, its a peaceful form of criticism and protest over a real issue. There is no damages except a bruise on a shitty company's image and likely not enough for a lawsuit or anything. There is nothing legally or ethically wrong about it as far as I can tell.
- it's misrepresentation, pure and simple. Imagine the outcry should the tables be turned!detritus
- its done in parody and criticism not with mal intent. If somebody impersonated greenpeace to criticize nobody could say anything.uuuuuu
- ...could say anything.uuuuuu
- if it was done to actually fool people and fuck over the company it would be a big defamation issue.uuuuuu
- Of course it was done to full people and fuck over Shell! That's the entire point of it! *facepalm*Nathan_Adams
- incorrect. they are criticizing its practices, that is not anything similar to trying to fuck them over.uuuuuu
- i just wonder about teh use of their logo and any donations gathered from this tricky!74LEO