Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #17374
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- ********0
- playing games with the word 'value'. Both the guys in this video are idiots of different stripeslocustsloth
- Locust, just curious, do you feel there needs to be something like a 70% tax on mega rich?********
- I want to hire this guy to go around and crush hippiesidentity
- Honestly, i don't know what kind of numbers the 'megarich' should be taxed at.locustsloth
- i think that the loop holes and tax shelters that the rich have at their disposal should be nixedlocustsloth
- i think that if the rich were truly interested in the prosperity of this country, they would carry the load that they could bearlocustsloth
- Cutting social programs instead of claiming the taxes the rich should already be paying is foolishlocustsloth
- it's like saying the guy with a dumptruck doesn't have to carry anything while the guy with the little red wagon has to haul the boulders up the hilllocustsloth
- boulders up the hilllocustsloth
- Let me ask you this, handle, do you think there should be no regulations on corps?locustsloth
- hard to say- regulations in which way? I do believe the we need to do something about making the trade situation more fair, but allowing companies to utilize cheaper labor in other countries I have no problem with. Its a world economy and there is no going back. Now for taxing the rich more of their "fair" share I dont think this makes sense. Yes I do believe they should not hav the chance to get loop hole benefits, but to make them pay an exorbitant amount more is wrong. If you do go and tax at 70%, at what...********
- more fair, but allowing companies to utilize cheaper labor in other countries I have no problem with. Its a world economy and there is no going back. Now for taxing the rich more of their "fair" share I dont think this makes sense. Yes I do believe they should not hav the chance to get loop hole benefits, but to make them pay an exorbitant amount more is wrong. If you do go and tax at 70%, at what point do you start? 500K 1Mil 5Mil? Its easy to say that they can afford to pay more, but what about...********
- economy and there is no going back. Now for taxing the rich more of their "fair" share I dont think this makes sense. Yes I do believe they should not hav the chance to get loop hole benefits, but to make them pay an exorbitant amount more is wrong. If you do go and tax at 70%, at what point do you start? 500K 1Mil 5Mil? Its easy to say that they can afford to pay more, but what about the money they would have to continue their businesses, employ people, etc. I feel it would stifle the entrepreneur from...********
- do believe they should not have the chance to get loop hole benefits, but to make them pay an exorbitant amount more is wrong. If you do go and tax at 70%, at what point do you start? 500K 1Mil 5Mil? Its easy to say that they can afford to pay more, but what about the money they would have to continue their businesses, employ people, etc. I feel it would stifle the entrepreneur from gaining more and more growth. Imagine if Steve Jobs had to give 70% of his money when he hit 1 billion... where is his incentive...********
- is wrong. If you do go and tax at 70%, at what point do you start? 500K 1Mil 5Mil? Its easy to say that they can afford to pay more, but what about the money they would have to continue their businesses, employ people, etc. I feel it would stifle the entrepreneur from gaining more and more growth. Imagine if Steve Jobs had to give 70% of his money when he hit 1 billion... where is his incentive to get there let alone how will he get past that mark and create more jobs? I do not believe it helps...********
- pay more, but what about the money they would have to continue their businesses, employ people, etc. I feel it would stifle the entrepreneur from gaining more and more growth. Imagine if Steve Jobs had to give 70% of his money when he hit 1 billion... where is his incentive to get there let alone how will he get past that mark and create more jobs? I do not believe it helps to be a welfare society. sorry for the length :)********
- would stifle the entrepreneur from gaining more and more growth. Imagine if Steve Jobs had to give 70% of his money when he hit 1 billion... where is his incentive to get there let alone how will he get past that mark and create more jobs? I do not believe it helps to be a welfare society. sorry for the length :)********
- when he hit 1 billion... where is his incentive to get there let alone how will he get past that mark and create more jobs? I do not believe it helps to be a welfare society. sorry for the length :)********
- do not believe it helps to be a welfare society. sorry for the length :)********