Politics

Out of context: Reply #17317

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    0

    ^
    Factory Jobs Obama Wants Are Unlikely to Return in Large Numbers
    http://www.businessweek.com/news…

    But of course, nix the Keystone XL plan (which would have created 10's of thousands of jobs) in order for one of your benefactors, Warren Buffet (DINO - Democrat In Name Only) to be able to control the shipping / transpo rights via Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC aka Berkshire Hathaway. I suppose Obama has nothing to gain from that, HUH!?!?! And the hypocritical talk of "The Buffet Rule". Fuck Buffet as well, he's playing the system and the Dems like a deck of cards and winning at it.
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/ar…

    @lowimpakt. Maybe you should pay attention to your own bankrupt ass country, Ireland? http://www.vanityfair.com/busine… headed the way of Greece and Spain if not already. PIIGS. Add the I for Ireland, not just Italy. Restructured economy anyone?

    • you keep repeating the Keystone jobs numbers even though you know they're a sham. Why?locustsloth
    • shame, noooooooooo dude, that would have produced many forms of jobs. The pipeline work itself, plus
      ********
    • residual companies. What do you think happens when a big industry is installed? Environmental, industrial parts, etc., etc., etc.
      ********
    • etc, etc. etc. Truly, I respect your opinion, but fuck that noise. It's about JOBS!
      ********
    • locust, it's not gonna matter, if he wins, which is likely based upon GOP crop, he'll become one of the GOP's best friends
      ********
    • nothing to lose, he'll pardon assholes and agree to so much nasty shit, admittedly so, you'll rue the day you voted for him
      ********
    • under the CHANGE theme. What a crock of shit, this guy.
      ********
    • 6000 jobs for the pipeline, most of which would be TEMPORARY. My problem is on one page you agree that the #'s are BS, but then repeat them herelocustsloth
    • then repeat them herelocustsloth
    • I agree the numbers were inflated, but I'm talking generically, residual jobs, etc. it would be in the 10's of 1000
      ********
    • 1000's
      ********
    • no, it wouldn't. It simply wouldn't, we know you're getting paid to argue this, so it's all fake. All this discussion is not real.mikotondria3
    • you're full of fucking crap and no, actually that's incorrect. There is no payment for me, but that'd be great!
      ********

View thread