Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #16992
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- ********0
Mike and Chantell Sackett vs. the EPA
The couple wanted to build a picturesque Idaho home. Instead they were accused of building on a wetland. Now the Supreme Court will hear their case
http://www.businessweek.com/maga…The Sacketts say they were stunned. The owners of an excavation company, they had secured all the necessary local permits. And Chantell Sackett says that before work began, she drove two hours to Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, to consult with an Army Corps of Engineers official. She says the official told her orally, though not in writing, that she didn’t need a federal permit. “We did all the right things,” she says.
The bottom line: The Supreme Court could turn a minor land dispute between an Idaho couple and the EPA into a far-reaching case on government power.
- good jsut like bush saying bald eagle isnt endangered so his buddy could build on protected land. fuckers!74LEO
- actually the Bald Eagle is no longer endangered, on the Least Concern list, but you can't shoot them.********
- http://en.wikipedia.…********
- but I see your point********