Global Warming
Out of context: Reply #201
- Started
- Last post
- 643 Responses
- deathboy-1
Im not discounting the negative impact on the environment that people make. Im just speculative to the extents and the level of the effects. Most studies look in the last 100 years or so. Few look at a large timeline scale because its almost impossible to calculate or quantify all the variables. And if they cant provide a result deeming their continued grants necessary theyll be out of a job. So easyier to do small scale and focus on factors that will provide the results your looking for. And those research people are usually funded by corps and gov agencies that are looking for the answers that fit their agendas. Its a business afterall. Scientists arent altruists that are doing it out of a common good. They need to keep their jobs.
And i question the effects climate change alarmists will have on people promoting their research through regulation and policy. If we dont have that much effect, and we slow the industrialization down to a crawl while the populations increase, it could lead to as much suffering as a possible climate change. after all industrialization also correlates with populations, would like to see some growth charts of pops and industrialization to go with the climate models that are trying to drive changes. but than again those will likely be biased in favor too. So ill just shrug. And say fuck it.
But i prefer nature to balance things better than people. The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry
- if your stance is all about the allocation of funding, i think you should be more concerned with the militaryscarabin
- i really don't think spending any amount of time or money on studying the effects of humanity on the planet is misplaced. you say "we just can't know all the variables" but with study hopefully we can come closescarabin
- say "we just can't know all the variables" but with study hopefully we can come closescarabin
- not about funding. i dont care who wants to fund what privately. Its how the data is manipulated through fear to gain controldeathboy
- gain control. I dont think it can be calcualted or quantified. we cant predict the weather a month in advance let alone a weekdeathboy
- week accurately. its just absurd. its about control/money through fear.deathboy
- best way to gain quick control is to destabalize through policy, blame soemone and offer hollow promisesdeathboy
- of course i think its more about cronie capitalism than pwoer mongering right now. but a good angle to work off of if your power hungrydeathboy
- power hungrydeathboy
- if it's about power then, you should consider who would benefit from a misinformation campaign. the wealthy who gain their wealth through carbon-producing practices like oil, or the people who are concerned about their effects?scarabin
- their wealth through carbon-producing practices like oil, or the people who are concerned about their effects?scarabin
- i consider both those gaining it and the leaders pandering to it.deathboy