PPO
Out of context: Reply #7
- Started
- Last post
- 10 Responses
- ********0
And i had an eye exam which i havent had in like ten years.... The person tested me for everything possible. Like she said "its probably just for fun", meaning unnecessary but see what happens and bill insurance. It didn't cost me a dime it was covered by insurance. Turned out i learned my eyes are just fine. The cost to learn that i have no idea. It wasnt disclosed to me. I should have asked. If i knew the cost and it was coming out of my pocket, i would have likely made a more rational decision on if i needed it, i.e. testing for glaucoma at my age was really unnecessary, especially considering my vision.
Peopel liek me participating in unecessary procedures increase insurance premiums. shit needs to be more on a supply and demand scale. What benefits do i get if i dont take advantage of the system? Nothing. Other peopel will continue to take advantage and my rates will still go up. So its in my best interest to milk it as much as i can and get a bailout from the rich.
- eye exam today...********
- and, the more people who think like that the more your premiums will rise, along with waiting times.Amicus
- yup and thats were the incentives are. do u expect people to not take advantage? wont change without curving incetives to supply demand approach********
- incetives to supply demand approach********
- eye exam today...