Politics
Out of context: Reply #14984
- Started
- Last post
- 33,770 Responses
- ********0
Im not in the gray on the taxes area. I personally don't mind since i wont really be effected. However if i was rich taking a loss id try to hedge it by changing up the labor sources i use. It could likely initially hurt job growth in areas, all the while keeping GDP pretty much the same. It will have both negative and positive consequences until it finds a balance. Always the problem when economics is controlled through decisions besides market forces. And i dont think the change would be that drastic or much of a wreck before its settled. And still i cant say what is a "right" progessive rate with all the tax laws and roundy rounds. And im curious too who can. Its just a larger understanding instead of focusing on the idea GE didnt pay taxes and so republicans are bad. Like GE cares theyll jsut get more subsidies for BS green tech and loss writeoffs if dems win. I blame companies and politcians far less then the masses of idiots who stay within party playbooks and jsut except it as thats what you have to do. I mean come on trump is running for president. Is shit really getting better? Somethign is wrong because people are so obsessed with being spoonfed the same party nonsense that is no different with who wins.
Im likely alright with 90 levels. But if war keeps up and market manipulation and increased welfare type (better word but cant think of it that media uses) stuff. well it wont really matter.
- or i am in gray area... but im ok with either. bigger fish to fry.********
- or i am in gray area... but im ok with either. bigger fish to fry.