Site Feedback?
Out of context: Reply #7
- Started
- Last post
- 22 Responses
- mcfly0
I appreciate it.
Linux/Unix, no we didn't test, but we don;t have a setup for that, most studios don't QA this, but sure, it makes sense.
I like having the feedback to think on, and likely implement.
we didn't design just for one user--it's compliant on Mac/PC, AOL/NN/IE/Safari, so pretty broad. It's not everyone, but it's a good sampling. your thoughts on those w/ disabled javascript--good point.
RE: 4.0 browsers, though; yes, I admit it, screw them. time to update. If this were a consumer or mass market site, we'd possibly test 4.0, but we're talking about browsers from 1996-7 for christ's sake, and this is a very specialized site for a fairly narrow demographic. I've been developing interactive since 1996. I do believe in retro-compliant work. But at some point, it goes too far. 7 year old browsers in my opinion are the user's issue to deal with.
That having been said, I think using a nested table in the main browser can get us a good effect all the same, and I'll probably redesign it, so thanks for the staunch user focused sentiment (you an IA? ;)