ops, GAP did it again
ops, GAP did it again
Out of context: Reply #33
- Started
- Last post
- 40 Responses
- randommail0
No copyright infringement risk at all in terms of the photo. What the heck is this person blogging about?
It's an original Photoshop painting or whatever you want to call it. It has no resemblance to the original work. The photographer can't claim ownership of the car, which was the only thing used as a image reference. Any claim would go nowhere, fast. Gap could easily produce an original photo that looked exactly like the one on Flickr, windshield reflections and all.
The only party that has any claim to infringement is Jaguar. If the image is identifiable distinctly as a Jaguar, and not any other car, then the Gap needs to pull it off the shelves asap.