ops, GAP did it again
ops, GAP did it again
Out of context: Reply #24
- Started
- Last post
- 40 Responses
- abettertomorrow0
Basically, I don't think there's ever been a case like this decided in court. There's no real legal precedent to point to.
- like every successful infringed photo case ever is the precedentDodecahedron
- There haven't been any though. Not in the digital age dealing with vector image that resembles a photo.abettertomorrow
- as mentioned the Fairey Obama poster case is a perfect precedentDodecahedron
- case settled out of court doesn't amount to any kind of precedentabettertomorrow
- well out of court means they made a profitable deal. the court didn't need to tell them to do that, it was in fact infringement anywayDodecahedron
- ...infringement and they both knew it.Dodecahedron
- If it wasn't real copyright infringement why would they make a deal? Fairey would tell them to f themselves its his money and posterDodecahedron