ops, GAP did it again
ops, GAP did it again
Out of context: Reply #20
- Started
- Last post
- 40 Responses
- ********0
You guys should brush up on your copyright law. Original photos aren't supposed to be altered and used for profit in any form. The fact that it's the same photo could be proven with a simple over lay, the wires are completely unique as a finger print as stated. It is infringement... but no gap is not going to lose sleep over it.
- Agreed that famous Hope poster settled out of court as wiki says http://en.wikipedia.… it's not legit.Iggyboo
- they worked a nice profitable deal out. its pretty common but just not always as high profile and I doubt big deals are worked out after all the time********
- ...not always worked out like Fairey's case.********