email signatures

Out of context: Reply #7

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 18 Responses
  • d_rek0

    I think it shows better email etiquette and is much more tasteful to use plain text. There are many reasons not to use an attached piece of artwork for a signature as well... but I wont get into all of them.

    I've argued with my CD and a few clients about this not all that long ago - it was about having the email signature be 'branded'. The arguement was for having their logo in the email - but really they did not have a reliable way outside of simply attaching the artwork to the email. They didn't have reliable webserver to have a hosted signature either, so that was out of the question.

    In the end I was able to convince CD/client that you could still keep the signature 'branded' through color and type with plain text. I think the solution ended up being much more elegant, not to mention practical, than attaching a logo/artwork to your email.

    • I agree with the first line. Too lazy to read the rest.set
    • I stopped writing after the first line anyway.d_rek
    • It's all just jibberish.d_rek
    • coolset

View thread