Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #13668
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- ukit0
Of course the obvious answer to what I said earlier is...of course we don't want to institutionalize privilege like in a monarchy. We just don't want to impede it. We want a free market system where everyone has a chance and because of that there are winners and losers.
Well, the question is whether everyone does have a chance. The concern is that we are moving further into a system where the rich have monarchy-like control...the deck is stacked against the rest of us covered up with the fig leaf of "free market capitalism."
- they can only have control through a govt. the downside of freemarkets is they lead to facism, and the antithesis of sorts socialism********
- sorts socialism. a healthy capitalism system is the balance. a balance isnt extreme and will shift********
- it will lean one way or other. thats all tjhat can be said generally about it i guess********
- There's another potential alternative, which is socialist libertarianismukit
- define that. another thign with words is theyre symbols and in politics its hard to understand what someone means by broad terms********
- terminology. i can only guess at what you may mean by that as a whole. i can comment better on an example where is tand********
- stand********
- they can only have control through a govt. the downside of freemarkets is they lead to facism, and the antithesis of sorts socialism