Tate Modern

Out of context: Reply #8

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 19 Responses
  • aanderton0

    Anyone else thinking wtf kind of blurring is that. Looks so shopped its horrendous.

    Nice idea though, might actually make the trip to go and see this. It's been a while since I've been to either of the Tate Gallerys.

    aanderton 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Tate Britain is pretty tight at the moment. http://www.amoderncl…neandersthal
    • shallow depth of field prob 1.2-1.8
      ********
    • re: image. it's shopped or shot with a lens filter. normal bokeh is circular.ItTango
    • that's not bokeh, it's depth of field, the range of distance in which objects are in focus
      ********
    • d of p does not create that effect. this bokeh would be a the result of wide openItTango
    • aperture and relatively small focal area.ItTango
    • i'll give you a link... you keep bitching... i'll upload a pic
      http://www.seemsartl…
      ********
    • d o f does not produce blurred foreground, sharp middle, and out blurred backgrounds.ItTango
    • your link supports me comments. no blurred foreground.ItTango
    • it's DOF, you have cheap lenses likely. aperture as low as possible. as close to the primary subject as possible
      ********
    • it does too dipshit.
      ********
    • not bitching. you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about.ItTango
    • where's the blurred foreground you simple twit.ItTango
    • you said something?
      ********
    • in the link, he states he focused on the red car in front.
      ********
    • Wow this is entertaining.aanderton
    • well i do it all the time with depth of field using a cheap lensrusty_ace
    • high five rusty ace
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread