site critique

Out of context: Reply #14

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 14 Responses
  • tymeframe0

    It feels like the site is simply out to gain hits and sell ads without contributing anything new.

    I mean, the layout and design of the site is basically from Web Designer Wall (which is a decent tutorial blog). The tutorials on the site are not that great. There are comments which actually explain how to write the code better (This actually helps the site). Then there's this... "These ‘back to top’ links can be essential for pages that have a long vertical stretch, allowing the user to easily glide back to the top of the page to navigate smoothly. You will need an extra plugin script for this to take action". Javascript isn't needed for this.

    Also, why not explain how a tutorial is compatible only with two browsers before making a reader follow down in the comments before finding that out?

View thread