Sexual Predatorette
Out of context: Reply #39
- Started
- Last post
- 68 Responses
- boobs0
Juhls, I'm not saying boys "know the consequences." It's just that "the consequences" don't particularly exist for them.
Unlike girls in a similar situation, they do not face the threat of pregnancy. They do not face the threat of public ridicule or ostracism. There is no tradition, in the west, that condemns male heterosexual behavior, at whatever age.
Girls and women, rightly or wrongly, face stigmas because of sexual activity. Men don't.
The boys in quo have not "lost" anything. They have not "been embarassed." They have not been rendered "unfit for marriage." In short, they face no negative consequences, in our society, from this behavior. They are not victims. Why should the woman be considered to have "harmed" them?
The idea that she has harmed these boys is silly. They'll be the envy of everyone at their school, and more popular than they were before.
She should be embarrassed. But that's about it.
It's a very good example of the old expression, "the law is an ass."
- You do not look at the point of view of the underage person in this situation. They don't know any better.juhls
- maybe they caught an std or some shitfxone
- Of course I look at the point of view of the "underage" boys: I'm jealous I didn't have a similar experience at their age.boobs
- What if he was 5 years old? You're not an adult until you're 18, and I'm fine with that law.juhls
- The idea that everyone needs to wait until 18 to have sex contravenes biology, norms of behavior, and common sense.boobs
- I'm speaking about the age of consent. You can still have sex with other people around your age before then.juhls
- I thought boys could get older women pregnant?404NotFound