Politics

Out of context: Reply #13196

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,769 Responses
  • Josev0

    Feds admit storing checkpoint body scan images:
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_…

    "For the last few years, federal agencies have defended body scanning by insisting that all images will be discarded as soon as they're viewed. The Transportation Security Administration claimed last summer, for instance, that "scanned images cannot be stored or recorded."

    "Now it turns out that some police agencies are storing the controversial images after all. The U.S. Marshals Service admitted this week that it had surreptitiously saved tens of thousands of images recorded with a millimeter wave system at the security checkpoint of a single Florida courthouse."

    • who cares? I'd rather have B&W photos of me floating around than get stripped searched every time I have to fly.fooler2
    • fly.fooler2
    • I'm sorry that you're not bright enough to understand that this could be abused. Also that it was implemented on the promise that the images would not be retained. But hey, ou country seems to bow to the lowest common denominator like you.Josev
    • promise that the images would not be retained. But hey, ou country seems to bow to the lowest common denominator like you.Josev
    • like you.
      Josev
    • you must be more afraid of people seeing your small cock than terrorist hiding bombs.fooler2
    • no, I'm okay with my endowment. I'm more afraid of complacent fools like you ruining my country.Josev

View thread