Micro Four Thirds camera
Out of context: Reply #26
- Started
- Last post
- 201 Responses
- Hombre_Lobo0
Haha, you are too kind sea_sea! I also think you should post some of your amazing pics to show him what to expect! :)
@Atkinson
the reason you probably settled on the e-p1/2 was there in built Inge stabalisation. Yeh your right the e-p2 is a lot of money, I wouldn't bother. You shouldreally consider the E-PL1 though because compared to the e-p1 and e-p2it has sharper images
in built IS, which only 1 stop less than the ep1/2 (this difference is almost unnoticable)
it can take an electronic viewfinder unlike the e-p1.
The E-PL1 has better ergonomics.
Better menu system
in built flash with the feature to bounce it off the ceilling indoors.The only real downside is that it is a plastic body and may not
feel as solid as the e-p1/2. However people who own both say they are both great build quality.If you not interested in unbuilt flash, and evf then e-p1 is a beautiful bargain that's for sure.
If you are you could get the E-PL1 14-42 kit and later buy the evf totaling around $680. You should be reminded that the evf of the e-p2 and e-pl1 (they are the same exact evf btw) is incredibly sharp and gets rave reviews.
Hope that helps.