Level of quality in work
Out of context: Reply #25
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- Miguex0
To be honest, I think this debate is just a way for old timers to try to separate themselves with the newcomers. There has always been bad photography, way before digital cameras were around, and it has nothing to do with your camera brand/ model being better or newer than another.I'm one of these people, and I'm the first one to say it, when my dad gave me my first film camera I had no interest in it. When I worked on a photo magazine with its own dark room/ slides light table, I wasn't interested either, but when I got my first point n shoot I was hooked.
I'm not a pro photographer buy any means, but I have worked in several photoshoots as lighting assistant just to learn, and I have seen and heard so many people putting "digital" down, and how their work is great cause they been shooting "film" for so long and that "you will never get a picture like mine, with that camera" sort of thing.
As soon as I hear stuff like that, I think.. this guy is insecure, he doesn't even know me and is already trashing people's work left and right, as he was waiting from some sort of validation from me.
Sorry, I don't care what kind of camera you shoot, or for how long you have been doing it, a good photo should be a good photo on it's own, I don't need you to whisper in my ear how good it is because of the kind of camera you used.
my 2 cents.