Politics

Out of context: Reply #12748

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • TheBlueOne0

    Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address 1837:

    “...the Government would have passed from the hands of the many to the hands of the few, and this organized money power from its secret conclave would have dictated the choice of your highest officers and compelled you to make peace or war, as best suited their own wishes. The forms of your Government might for a time have remained, but its living spirit would have departed from it...It is one of the serious evils of our present system of banking that it enables one class of society--and that by no means a numerous one--by its control over the currency, to act injuriously upon the interests of all the others and to exercise more than its just proportion of influence in political affairs. The agricultural, the mechanical, and the laboring classes have little or no share in the direction of the great moneyed corporations, and from their habits and the nature of their pursuits they are incapable of forming extensive combinations to act together with united force. Such concert of action may sometimes be produced in a single city or in a small district of country by means of personal communications with each other, but they have no regular or active correspondence with those who are engaged in similar pursuits in distant places; they have but little patronage to give to the press, and exercise but a small share of influence over it; they have no crowd of dependents about them who hope to grow rich without labor by their countenance and favor, and who are therefore always ready to execute their wishes. The planter, the farmer, the mechanic, and the laborer all know that their success depends upon their own industry and economy, and that they must not expect to become suddenly rich by the fruits of their toil. Yet these classes of society form the great body of the people of the United States; they are the bone and sinew of the country--men who love liberty and desire nothing but equal rights and equal laws, and who, moreover, hold the great mass of our national wealth, although it is distributed in moderate amounts among the millions of freemen who possess it. But with overwhelming numbers and wealth on their side they are in constant danger of losing their fair influence in the Government, and with difficulty maintain their just rights against the incessant efforts daily made to encroach upon them. The mischief springs from the power which the moneyed interest derives from a paper currency which they are able to control, from the multitude of corporations with exclusive privileges which they have succeeded in obtaining in the different States, and which are employed altogether for their benefit; and unless you become more watchful in your States and check this spirit of monopoly and thirst for exclusive privileges you will in the end find that the most important powers of Government have been given or bartered away, and the control over your dearest interests has passed into the hands of these corporations.”

    http://www.famousquotes.me.uk/sp…

    • panic of 1837... specie circular... at least greenspan admitted he underestimated human nature.
      ********
    • but still its good to know about his history. its better then a speech made with a down turned economy he helped make.
      ********
    • make. be better quoting einstein. he'd support your ends better. instead of blame he used reason.
      ********
    • http://www.huppi.com… this is pretty good. individual motive and human nature i question, but he says basically slaves.
      ********
    • it reminds me of huxley. its rational, but there will be dissent unless you can convince people its in their interests, which i think he addressed in the schooling
      ********
    • interest which i think he covered in schooling. i may not agree with all aspects of his hypothesis, but its rational and i like that
      ********
    • i like that
      ********
    • and blue ive got a question for you after reading the einstein. why would anti-capitalist not refer to him more. hes a big name. he could help grow the brand
      ********
    • name and he could help grow the brand?
      ********

View thread