digital vs film
Out of context: Reply #35
- Started
- Last post
- 65 Responses
- tc_fisher0
we should not give kids Hasselholf's. This world only gets one david hasselholf. And that's almost too much to handle. He sings ya know...
Give 'em a hasselblad. That would work better. but kinda pricey.
And on the subject of kids... Fuck yeah, that they all get to shoot. They all get to create. digital or analog. who cares.
you know why? because content is king.
which i'm sure, i'm hopefull this idea of content was brought up earlier in the 30-somthin other posts... it's just like those kids in forums debating the fucking Fstops on a nikon to a canon or the computer heads that don't buy a computer to make things with because they can't figure out if they should get the xxxmghz one now or wait for the rumored UBERbox coming in out in 1 month to 3 years, that was found on that site with that guy.
i want content. and the only way to get that content is people, lots of people getting off their asses with their disposable camera or their new wiz bang Canon Digital SLR and going out there and fucking making something that will bring about some emotion in me.
i want a world of creatives. i want a world where everyone has a camera. a paintbrush. a typewriter or a wacom tablet. where the thought process of - i want to be a stock broker so bad i can taste all of that coin and rich semen right now! doesn't happen.
Really. who wouldn't want more artists.
analog or digital still gets printed out on film paper. what matters is what's on that film paper. the content. god damn it's about the content and not the tool makin' it.