Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #11584
- Started
- Last post
- 33,770 Responses
- ukit0
Perfect example
http://www.politico.com/news/sto…
I thought they would be happy with that Supreme Court ruling that lets corporations spend directly on elections. But it looks like the RNC itself is now actually appealing a case to the SC to try and overturn the $2,000 cap on donations to a campaign for individuals and replace it with NO CAP at all. So if someone wants to deposit $500 million into a candidate's bank account, they can.
Someone defend this and tell me why this is a good idea, and more importantly why is Michael Steele and the RNC involved in this? Are they doing it because they care about your "freedom?"
- bc money=freedom for them. That is, and all it is. If you have money, you have freedom. If you don;t, well..********
- I dunno is it even gets to an ideological level, they probably just want money from their billionaire supporters;)ukit
- money doesnt = freedom. just as money cant buy love. money can be power which is likely whast its all about. i dont liek corporations buying congress and hate more the men in congress who let it happen********
- like companies buyign politicians and hate even more the politcians that get bought. hard to find one who isnt, last current admin speaking of which********
- and current admin speaking of. the type of job attracts those type of men. like sharks to chum********
- bc money=freedom for them. That is, and all it is. If you have money, you have freedom. If you don;t, well..