96% of Media Companies...

Out of context: Reply #19

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 36 Responses
  • ********
    0

    @gabe- Don't get me wrong, I don't feel hatred towards any particular race. However off the bat, I don't believe the article was anti-semitic as the information from the article holds validity to historical records, filled with lots of statical information. The lens being used however is questionable asking whether media monopolies being 'Jewish-owned' should hold any relevance in current events. To be skeptical on the subject, is not anti-semetic. However believing everything media tells you would be acceptance of brainwashing.

    With that said, the opening statement of the document by the Israeli spokesman is provocative and a questionable quote, however does not change the hierarchy and ownership of today's media.

    There was some negative references to "gangsta rap" and their negative feelings towards whites, condemning gangsta rap's jewish originations. When in fact the genre of music was a product of Warner Brothers. This creates a new perspective on not just the rapper, but the company that signed the rap group to begin with. Going deeper behind the company's brand(since this is a race case) I would ask, why would a Jewish owned company promote a group that held negative feelings towards whites?

    However the biggest issue in the whole matter is how much filtration, censorship are we getting in the media. Understanding what is going on in current events. Is it possible that America's actions and understandings are being mediated via a Jewish influence? Are American soldiers being deployed for reasons of money or fulfilling biblical prophecy or killing two birds with one stone?

View thread