A tool to deceive and slaughter

Out of context: Reply #30

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 37 Responses
  • ********
    0

    2jolly_rotten: dismissing Larsen as aping Hirst is like dismissing Hirst as aping Duchamp—which is too simple/easy a forumlation without taking into account the great sphere of relations at work in the piece/their practice.

    • gfm
      ********
    • The aping was in the title being the source of meaning. w/o the title the object would only be a contract. The title gives Art gloss.
      ********
    • gives it an Art gloss.
      ********
    • That's hirst-y
      ********

View thread