anti-Flash bias?
Out of context: Reply #16
- Started
- Last post
- 40 Responses
- enobrev0
i agree, and you SHOULD knock all the stuff out there that sucks (if at least to cure boredom) but html doesn't require a 5 minute loading bar as well as cpu processaes, memory usage, network communication, plugin download and installation and all the other burdens to one's machine in order to find out that it was all just to make the 450 x 450 jpgs with the shitty dropshadows fade in and spin...
meanwhile, html is parsed, looks like shit -but the content is instant, you get what you need and get the fuck out.
and of course i see the potential in flash.. i've been touting potentials of it that not many have even acomplished as of yet... most current uses (even the pretty ones i see here all the time) are STILL very primitive.
but until now, and mostly likely continuing into the future, besides those who have used flash correctly, it fucking blows.