avatar
Out of context: Reply #77
- Started
- Last post
- 191 Responses
- version30
although impressed by the "effects" (3d) I don't feel that is was anything significant, now i have to admit to it being some time (a decade, at least 3652 days since my last 3d movie) but was my imagination that much greater when i was 21-22?
i doubt it, but i remember enjoying 3d movies then if not much earlier as a child and believing there to be some depth to them and not a blue red mess that our parent would complained giving them headaches.
I saw several very sharp images in layers on top of one another and was baffled at why the text hung out there floating during the video diaries but aside from those details you never see anything affected by depth of field in a natural manner. either a layer was in focus or it wasn't.
i took my glasses off several times to look at the rgb splits and was mostly amazed with the rich color capable of coming through those recyclable glasses being worn in the dark
- 'that our parents would complain about"version3
- Good point - those glasses are pretty crap. I'm sure it looks better with technology that theatres probably can't affordukit
- i'd pay more for a ticket if there were better glasses somewhereversion3
- Maybe that;s the plot of Avatar 2 -quest for the better 3D Glassesukit
- Lord of of the Lensversion3