Website Review
Out of context: Reply #23
- Started
- Last post
- 38 Responses
- ********0
Ok, fine—criticism.
There's nothing really Web 2.0 about the site. Don't mean to harp on that, but you stated that was your goal, and you didn't say anything else. So no, I don't (and clearly many others don't) feel this is anywhere near approaching a Web 2.0 functionality.
Content-wise, I don't really have any clue of what I'm looking at. There's very little content on the site, and what little there is you are showing via pop-up, which in my personal opinion (and many others') is not the best method.
The home page does nothing to introduce the content, or setup the "author" or "artist" here. I use quotations, because again, I don't know what I'm looking at.
"News" is empty, which is not reassuring.
You have a forward slash separator for your navigation, and a pipe as well—redundant. Choose the / or the | and stick with one of them.
When clicking through the sub-nav of photo galleries, your menu jumps from the right to the left, not sure why.
Lots of info in the résumé, but poor visual/info hierarchy. Makes it hard to read. And again, no information about yourself.
All in all, it's bare, and makes it hard for anyone to give you a serious critique.
Thanks.