Global Warming
Out of context: Reply #124
- Started
- Last post
- 643 Responses
- raf0
You raise a valid question lowimpakt: why are "they" banning a good product which offers light which is relatively similar to natural light and promote one that:
a. is highly toxic, brings biohazard risk to your home and guarantees environmental pollution,
b. produces unhealthy, unnatural type of light,
c. is only more efficient under certain conditions?How do they get away with claims of these being environmentally friendly?
How can you put the safer, incandescent bulb alongside poisonous stuff like "cadmium, lead, hexavalent chromium" is also beyond my understanding.
Who wins due to incandescent bulb ban? Only corporations which invested in CFL technology. They are sure to have removed competition from incandescent light bulb makers from less developed countries. It is a market worth fat billions, everyone owns more than one light bulb.