Global Warming

Out of context: Reply #120

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 643 Responses
  • lowimpakt0

    "they" "forcibly" ??

    By"they" I assume you mean the European Commission. Why would "they" on the one hand force a toxic product on people at the will of the big bad corporations and on the other hand develop massively complex legislation that forces chemical companies to publish safety data information on the chemical they release into the market? (information which they don't currently make public)

    you do know there are tens of thousands of chemicals on the market that aren't properly regulated? who is responsible for checking the safety/toxicity of these chemicals individually and in combination? you? the chemical companies? jesus?

    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/…

    why would "they" have decades developing comprehensive product safety regulations (such as the CE scheme) and monitoring systems that have encouraged industry to increasingly protect human health and the environment only to force through a toxic product on people?

    why would "they" develop comprehensive legislation phasing out specific hazardous substances (cadmium, lead, hexavalent chromium etc) from electronic products (tvs, computers etc etc) only to force a toxic product on people?

    • ever heard of "RoundUp"GeorgesII
    • You tell me why. My guess is: money. Everyone uses light bulbs, it is a market worth billions.raf

View thread