Politics

Out of context: Reply #9162

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,772 Responses
  • BonSeff0

    god dammit, the public option isn't about the actual health care treatment. it is the option to get coverage for treatment. and it is paid for with premiums. do some fucking research.

    BonSeff 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • It's paid for with taxpayer dollars dude. PLEASE get your facts straight.
      ********
    • no. it isn't. dipshit.BonSeff
    • uninsured and immigrants going to the ER is paid for with tax dollars. you fucking fool.BonSeff
    • i dont care how they spin it a public options is paid with tax dollars. call it premiums if u like
      ********
    • what do u call the penalty that was proposed for not takign the option
      ********
    • there is no question in the philosophy behind such a public option.
      ********
    • a penalty will never pass. and it is paid for with premiums. it is a policy. jesus fucking christBonSeff
    • so your saying its corporate business, that will operate based on peoples premiums alone if they choose it or not.
      ********
    • and who will see the profits, because if it operates at a loss it will fail. or will it operate at a loss and tax payers cover it?
      ********
    • its either an insurance company or its an insurance company subidized by tax payer dollars.
      ********
    • also what is the biz plan... lower rates to force other companies to lower theres, regardless of any loss or it its sustainable.
      ********
    • if its sustainable. gov biz survive bc taxpayer capital but others will be forced out of business.
      ********
    • i am not going to go through the trouble to explain this to you. if you dont get it, you dont get itBonSeff
    • oh i get it completely, im just trying to help u out. u seem to be in denial that such an idea is by theory socialistic
      ********
    • they are charging premiums you halfwit.BonSeff
    • nice spelling of 'theres'
      omg      BonSeff
    • minimal premiums that likely wont cover the costs. so then what. how will charging less and increasing coverage keep the plan in the black
      ********
    • in the black. and if they go in the red will the program be abandoned or will it be subsidized.
      ********
    • not to mention the layign down the infrastructure is a tax payer intial cost too. or is china providing startup cash?
      ********
    • if u think it won't cost a tax payer dollar please give me some of yur koolaid bc i'd be happier if i could believe that
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread