Polanski

Out of context: Reply #31

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 150 Responses
  • freitag0

    last thing, because quite honestly, the both of you couldn't be more retarded than any one-celled puddle hoarding entity, i wasn't talking here about the fact whether he is a plumber or a director. and i wasn't discussing the rule of law either you silly fucks.

    (the fan thing was obviously tongue in cheek, but you homebound idiots couldn't recognize if it hit you in the face like a wet towel).

    what i tried to point out (but you clearly don't read news too well or thorough either) is the harm the reopening of this case can do to the victim, her family and children. it's quite a shamefull thing for all. yet, doesn't have to be traumatic per sé. and before you fucks scream pederast or anything again, go look at some facts.

    so like i said, the thing is purely legal, and that is good. but the press will be all over it and so the private life of the victim will be for the whole world to awe over.

    how's that for a win-win situation?

    you judgemental brainless fucks.

    • go finish your website you talentless dim-witted fuck!utopian
    • well that was so on-topic of you. how intelligent.freitag
    • And thanks for looking out for the victim.utopian
    • But Janne, you're saying the law should relax because of a possible press frenzy affecting the victims?
      ********

View thread