Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #8859
- Started
- Last post
- 33,771 Responses
- BonSeff0
"Me: No he's a liar ..."
You want to be so staunch to wrap this all up in a nice, tight 'lil simple debate.. explain the above. put your money where your mouth is and let's make this interesting. i'll entertain your ignorant statement for a volley or two
- I addressed this within the context of my entire statement thankszman
- pfft. explain "liar" dipshitBonSeff
- don't call me a dipshit retard you're proving my pointzman
- hence the premise of my question, which you dumb fucks never graspBonSeff
- mix in some comprehensionBonSeff
- ok this whole thing went waaaay over your head.zman
- 'you dumb fucks' = republican racist, right? pointa proven-edzman
- no, not really, you used a really poor example..BonSeff
- so who are 'you dumb fucks' then?zman
- Having a conversation with you is like that who's on first routine.
Zman you need to articulate your argumentRamanisky2 - i get z's point, but not sure if bon understands it or if he is jsut skipping over the aknowledgemetn and going to questioning********
- the questioning of why hes a liar. becuase he state din one line they wont get coverage but says they will in plenty of others, even if he has to call them soemthing********
- other lines or if he has to call them soem like semi illegals becuase theyve been obver a 90 day period. they get it now. that wont change********
- the point bon is u stereotype based on certian repsonse and jump to mediatype conclusions that have no merit********
- fuck im thinkign about jsut supporting everything to see collapse happen faster, it could be interesting********
- step up and post on the next page, mr. funny spellerBonSeff
- you fucking idiots piss me off.BonSeff
- haha i try not to argue with fools becuase at a distance its hard to make out whos who********