sam flores... doh!

Out of context: Reply #12

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 18 Responses
  • instrmntl0

    also, he apologized in that thread:

    <em>sam flores, on July 29th, 2009 at 9:43 pm Said:</em>

    First and foremost, I’d like to offer my sincerest apologies to anyone I’ve offended regarding a mistake I’ve made recently reinterpreting a Jon Foster image. Before I explain the carelessness that led to this, I want you to know that I have already contacted him directly and offered all compensation made from the posters, as well as a public apology for not thoroughly researching my source of inspiration. I was looking online awhile ago searching for old illustrations from the 1900s and came across a small image of a tree painting that I dragged to my desktop. It was on the same page as Arthur Rackham’s paintings, and my mistake was assuming it also belonged to Rackham, and revisiting the image without thorough research, i wanted to have one of my characters visiting his painting as sort of a homage not to pass it off as my own. There’s absolutely no excuse for this neglect on my behalf, and I’ve learned a huge lesson in all this to always do your homework. I never intended to deliberately use his art and pass it off as my own. My biggest regret, however, was meeting such a talented artist under such unfortunate and preventable circumstances, and undermining his work on account of my negligence. Once again, I apologize if I let anyone down and promise to be more responsible as a working artist humbly in the presence of exceptionally talented peers.

    • It's a bad excuse -> (I'm sorry, I meant to rip off Rackham not you John) and anyway, would Rackham have painted a kid in a teeshirt with a tattoo?lukus_W
    • a teeshirt with a tattoo?lukus_W

View thread