Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #8457
- Started
- Last post
- 33,771 Responses
- zman0
you know lowimpakt I had the same thought about capatalism and anarchism just the other day when someone on the radio happened to mention "there is no 'free market'" . I'm trying to remember the context, it was something on democracynow. In order for the true ideal of a free market to exist the government would have to mind its own business.
- Then there is no free market.TheBlueOne
- Freedom in any social sphere exists only within an agreed upon area.TheBlueOne
- Outside of that, nature rules, thus he who has gets and their is no equality or freedom.TheBlueOne
- yea a complete free market would destroy itself, but when they say free market they dont mean utopian.********
- like for example, no gov, no anti monopoly. a monopoly on a important resource, or collective fucks people********
- the idea free market is applied i think, becuase gov is way too involved causing mroe problems********
- and pretty, pretty pretty close freemarket doesnt have the same zing********
- gov responsible for healthcare increases back in ww2 when they capped pay, leading to employer based insurance********
- i think that had to have had a huge impact on growth of an insurance industry, companies afford mor ethen private********
- raising cost for private plans. i have no evidence, but def soemthign to look into.********
- regardless free market pertains mainly to the original US constitution BOR stuff. when gov is limited********
- and not like a strong athens where gov rules by majority rule regardless of rights violations********