Show some recent work
Show some recent work
Out of context: Reply #2192
- Started
- Last post
- 8,718 Responses
- linearch0
- too much is going onMau
- I'm not reading W W unfortunately - more like W V.JerseyRaindog
- looks a little blurry and vw looks a little odd. Do like the typefaceRavdyk
- Plus when that Didot is reduced you're gonna lose some fine detail in there.JerseyRaindog
- too many fonts? too many swirlly thingies?linearch
- and I would never use a comma in a logo... the illu is too detailed, the "linespacing" is somehow wrongMau
- so too much detail in general? i need to take a walklinearch
- 2 fonts are fine with me.. but you don´t need the the italic weightMau
- looks like a nice job... I am sure you can do it better... I like the typecombi btwMau
- and like JerseyRaindog mentioned before.. you will loose the fine lines.. you should take a bolder weight http://www.moamoa.or…Mau
- http://www.moamoa.or…Mau
- is that top font just didot bold? that's what i have but somehow looks different?linearch
- is there an extra bold or black didot? looking around now....linearch
- further to the previous - I don't know of any other New Yorks.detritus
- not seeing one.....
http://www.typograph…
does anyone have alts of didot that are a little stronger?linearch - its the Hoefler&Frere Version
http://www.moamoa.or…
Mau - mau always does it the easy way********
- yeah drop one of the NEW YORK. there can only be one. :-)akrokdesign
- don't listen to them********
- it's new york in state of new york i guess********
