"law" of evolution?
Out of context: Reply #34
- Started
- Last post
- 90 Responses
- Khurram0
These are some of the things you used to say:
http://www.qbn.com/topics/387732…
I love monkeys, Fariska. They way they pee into their mouths and fling feces is endearing. No, I'm just saying that science is demonstrating that we do not share a common ancestry with them.http://www.qbn.com/topics/387732…
Mimio, how is it that we do not share a common ancestry? Well we could fill this thread with a books-worth. In a nutshell, because science demonstrates that species to species mutations could not happen.http://www.qbn.com/topics/387732…
emokid, the problem is that the most recent evidence shows that evolution did not and could not have happened.http://www.qbn.com/topics/387732…
When did they exist? Depends on who you ask. ;) I would say they were within the last 10,000 years because I believe there was rapid fossilization due to a world-wide deluge. But the "when" is not the issue, I don't think.http://www.qbn.com/topics/387732…
dobs, there's plenty of geological evidence that demonstrates a young earth and rapid fossilization. Radiometric dating is terribly unreliable. But we've already beaten that dead horse here.I just put discipler in the filter and found that. I could dig more if i was bothered THAT much.
2005 bro! FOUR YEARS you've been beating this horse.
FOUR fucking YEARS.