Politics
Out of context: Reply #8090
- Started
- Last post
- 33,772 Responses
- ukit0
This is what I mean...you go on a ten-minute rant about imperialism without even understanding what the word means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imp…
"The term imperialism commonly refers to a political or geographical domain such as the Ottoman Empire[2] the Russian Empire,[3] the Chinese Empire, or the British Empire"
Imperalism has nothing to do with "nationalizing the US auto industry" (which hasn't happened, BTW) or the amount of money spent by the government. It definitely doesn't refer to health care reform (which, once again, you fail at describing). It almost always refers to colonialism, i.e., taking over other countries, which is something that would definitely describe Bush's policies since he initiated the Afghan and Iraq Wars. If anything, Obama's shift re: Israel could be described as "anti-Imperialist."
So what was your point again? At least when I argue with tommyo or others I can assume there's an intelligent person on the other end. You're like a cartoon, repeating the most extreme talking points without any understanding of what you're saying. It sounds like you're mad at something, I'm trying to figure out what.
Maybe time to take a "sanity break" from this site again and then return under a different username like before:)
- You're running from the facts and spinning reality in circles again Mr. Ukit. Nice try.********
- You're running from the facts and spinning reality in circles again Mr. Ukit. Nice try.