Politics
Out of context: Reply #8059
- Started
- Last post
- 33,772 Responses
- tommyo0
Interesting...
Two EPA Staffers Question Science Behind Climate 'Endangerment' Proposal
"The report's authors say EPA accepted findings reached by outside groups, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, "without a careful and critical examination of their own conclusions and documentation."
The report says EPA used outdated science to support its finding. The authors cite studies that show -- among other things -- declining global temperatures and a changing scientific consensus on weather patterns. "We believe our concerns and reservations are sufficiently important to warrant a serious review of the science by EPA before any attempt is made to reach conclusions on the subject," Carlin and Davidson wrote."
"In exchanges between March 12 and March 17, Carlin asked McGartland to forward his comments to the office responsible for managing the endangerment finding's development. McGartland declined. "The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision," he wrote (E&E Daily, June 25)."
- Every time Obama says "global warning", he's LYING. Oh, music to Goldman Sack's ears though, right? Hmmm???********
- Every time Obama says "global warning", he's LYING. Oh, music to Goldman Sack's ears though, right? Hmmm???