That Will Teach You
Out of context: Reply #20
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- itsmitch0
The judge is clearly corrupt and/or in the pockets of the recording companies. Our justice system is not based on revenge or teaching "lessons" which is clearly what they're doing. She's not responsible for the people that downloaded the files from her system -- those people are responsible for their own infringement and should be brought up in other cases. The losses she is justified in paying to the record companies is roughly: $1,700 but actually $24 for the "lost" revenue of the only songs that the lawyers were able to account for. This shouldn't have made it out of small claims court. It's not like she has a warehouse of CDs she's selling on a corner. She made no profit. She didn't send people the songs. If there is a hell, these lawyers have a guaranteed place in it.