BNP is cool :)
Out of context: Reply #16
- Started
- Last post
- 37 Responses
- ********0
>he's a slightly distrubed individual whose overriding political concern
> is the preservation of some idealised European identity. And he acts
> likes... well wotevaI will shortly explain all of my views here:
Generalized, my view is the same for each ethnicity: that each people and culture have their own right to evolve according to their own logics. There is no universal patterns of development (models which the West is trying to force on "backward" nations -- US being its foremost vanguard), no universal religion (some islamic groups, which you have noticed I am against), no universal doctrines of freedom etc etc
The humanity as a whole has been living in very heterogeneous traditional societies for thousands of years, ie. tribes, nations, which all are diverse in character. The problem with traditional societies is that they tend to be docile or even totalitarian, they treat people as obedient human cattle which the society fills with ideas, cults, religion etc when they are growing up. Such is the nature of man.
Modern liberal societies teach that a person should be left alone, that nothing can be demanded from him, and you, btw, should mind your own business. "Freedom from" is liberation from all interferences; all socio-political, traditional and religious norms. And so, modern liberal societies do not provide spiritual completion to young people, because, ideally, in a liberal society there is no standard national content, but pluralism of contents, and they leave people alone with their emptiness, making them seek a sense of belonging elsewhere -- they become emos, goths, wiggers, nazis, associate themselves with sport teams etc -- which becomes esp. acute in young age around 20 y.
(Normal human beings are collective creatures, and by default are characterized by a complete absence of their own opinion. 90% of people are lemmings. Only a handful of people can be truly individuals. Artists and scientists for example can be non-conformist, because the elitist aspect of being alone is part of the creative process, but in their case this is a nietzschean burden, ie. more like a special curse or a function which you have to carry, and not necessarily something you want. Artists and scientists experience the world as maximally open, inharmonic and terrifying, with all its injustice and contradictions, and because of this they are unhappy. While lemmings on the other hand experience the world as maximally dull, living by routines etc, and this is in fact a better and much easier way to live. Being normal, ie. being a shiteating lemming is a blessing.)
The problem with liberalism is that it relies on the humanistic and benevolent concept that people are noble, well-meaning and caring beings, who will only do good things, and that they will live happily together like a big family no matter what.
What I'm trying to say it that people are fucking stupid. Our anthropology hasn't changed along with the politics and 90% of all people still do not fit into this description. Modern liberal societies have existed for no more than some 100 years, it is still only an experiment. When right-wing movement is rising all across Europe, reaching 29% in Austria recently, anti-immigration oriented party Frp in Norway gaining record votes, and I start grinding my hands is not necessarily because I am right-winged myself, but because I get a certain satisfaction from the fact that I was right. That the world after all is not all about drooling weak-minded humanism and vegetarism you expect it to be